We should have all skins in various resolutions to fit users machines. I for one have an odd resolution of 1366x768 and others also have odd resolutions as well.
I have used the resizer tool and it still looks stretched.
Better yet, all VDJ skins should "SNAP" to the correct size instantly just like other softwares.
Is this possible to do?
I have used the resizer tool and it still looks stretched.
Better yet, all VDJ skins should "SNAP" to the correct size instantly just like other softwares.
Is this possible to do?
Posté Sat 10 Oct 09 @ 5:36 pm
Hi,
And when you click on the maximize button of any skin, doesn't the software skin "snap" to the size of your screen?
And when you click on the maximize button of any skin, doesn't the software skin "snap" to the size of your screen?
Posté Sat 10 Oct 09 @ 6:20 pm
Hi , i have a new laptop with 1366 x 768 i need a skin .. please
Posté Sun 11 Oct 09 @ 8:49 pm
JeremK wrote :
Hi,
And when you click on the maximize button of any skin, doesn't the software skin "snap" to the size of your screen?
And when you click on the maximize button of any skin, doesn't the software skin "snap" to the size of your screen?
"
Quote :
Better yet, all VDJ skins should "SNAP" to the correct size instantly.
Instantly is the key operative word in that sentence.
When I hit the maximize button it does snap to fit but it's Stretched out. Platters that are circles turn into sideways ovals and the CBG's are off center. I am hoping that sometime in the future (hope not far future) one will not need to use maximize button but all skins will natively...SNAP... to the correct resolution with no distortion, no maximize button and no skin resizer tool.
I'm not criticizing but trying to bring light to something I've seen that could be improved upon.
Thanks for your interest in this topic.
Posté Sun 11 Oct 09 @ 10:46 pm
deejaytoo wrote :
Hi , i have a new laptop with 1366 x 768 i need a skin .. please
Try this http://www.virtualdj.com/addons/8558/Over_Flow_Odd.html
Posté Sun 11 Oct 09 @ 10:59 pm
I'm just brining attention to this thread again.
Posté Thu 29 Oct 09 @ 12:29 am