vidanes
Hey guys,
I just read some stories here and there and I still can't make a decision on what format is better. I want to rip all my CD collection and I would like to get the best sound for the same quality (192Kbps). Which one do you think is the best format?
I just read some stories here and there and I still can't make a decision on what format is better. I want to rip all my CD collection and I would like to get the best sound for the same quality (192Kbps). Which one do you think is the best format?
Posté Mon 26 Jun 06 @ 10:32 pm
DJ Cyder
mp3 hands down most compatiable format..
Posté Mon 26 Jun 06 @ 10:33 pm
phillydj
mp3 wma sux...microsoft piss poor attempt at a mp3
Posté Mon 26 Jun 06 @ 10:39 pm
shawnweber
/agree
On it's best day, wma is = mp3. mp3 is all round better in reality.
On it's best day, wma is = mp3. mp3 is all round better in reality.
Posté Tue 27 Jun 06 @ 2:27 am
Phenryll
make some tests guy.
wma is good at low bitrate. But mp3 is better at higher bitrate than 80. It is my opinion and my ears are not destroy :p
You should have added what about the quality of OGG. Definoitely better that mp3 and WMA. But not still popular actually.
wma is good at low bitrate. But mp3 is better at higher bitrate than 80. It is my opinion and my ears are not destroy :p
You should have added what about the quality of OGG. Definoitely better that mp3 and WMA. But not still popular actually.
Posté Tue 27 Jun 06 @ 5:59 am
DJ PHIL IT
u r right mp3 is good if u rip it high wma at 160 sounds like 192 in mp3
Posté Wed 28 Jun 06 @ 2:40 am
shawnweber
mp3 isn't necissilarly the best, it's just the most widely used and most widley supported.
Posté Wed 28 Jun 06 @ 2:40 am
JeremK
Just the same way CD isn't the best. SACD is better but not as widley supported.
Posté Wed 28 Jun 06 @ 12:39 pm
shawnweber
exactly
Posté Wed 28 Jun 06 @ 7:39 pm