Sonido Alto Voltaje
Give VDJ the option to analyze multiple files for BPM at once.
Posté Tue 15 Jul 14 @ 2:16 pm
PhantomDeejay
You can allready do that.
Right click on a folder -> Batch->Analyze for BPM
Or:
Select multiple files on the browser (CTRL+A, CTRL+Click, SHIFT+Click) right click on one of them, ->Batch->Analyze for BPM
Right click on a folder -> Batch->Analyze for BPM
Or:
Select multiple files on the browser (CTRL+A, CTRL+Click, SHIFT+Click) right click on one of them, ->Batch->Analyze for BPM
Posté Wed 16 Jul 14 @ 3:38 am
groovindj
I think he means the ability to process more than one at a time, not just to select them.
VDJ only scans one file, then moves to the next one. Software such as Mixed In Key analyses multiple files at once.
VDJ only scans one file, then moves to the next one. Software such as Mixed In Key analyses multiple files at once.
Posté Wed 16 Jul 14 @ 3:46 am
PhantomDeejay
Yes, VDJ scans only one file at the time and there's a good reason behind it: Not to use too many resources that may cause your sound skip, stutter, e.t.c.
Remember, above all VirtualDj is a real time media player software. It's not a media analyzer!
Remember, above all VirtualDj is a real time media player software. It's not a media analyzer!
Posté Thu 17 Jul 14 @ 12:59 am
Sonido Alto Voltaje
PhantomDeejay wrote :
Yes, VDJ scans only one file at the time and there's a good reason behind it: Not to use too many resources that may cause your sound skip, stutter, e.t.c.
Remember, above all VirtualDj is a real time media player software. It's not a media analyzer!
Remember, above all VirtualDj is a real time media player software. It's not a media analyzer!
VDJ is obviously not a media analyzer but analyzing tracks is a big part of its functionality. With computers getting so powerful single file scanning seems a bit outdated. Besides you wouldn't implement a feature like this without carefully planing for it. Something like an offline scanning mode or only one track at a time if a track is playing.
Posté Thu 17 Jul 14 @ 1:26 am
groovindj
Agreed - something smarter would be good.
Of course we don't want playing tracks to be interrupted, so if scanning takes X CPU percentage then only allow scanning if there's enough safety margin (maybe twice X or something).
If CPU is low enough, use the spare power to analyse as many tracks as possible. If playing something, scan fewer tracks.
In other words - if nothing else is happening, scan the max possible with all cores. If something else is going on, give the scan less priority.
More playing, less scanning. Less playing, more scanning. :-)
Of course we don't want playing tracks to be interrupted, so if scanning takes X CPU percentage then only allow scanning if there's enough safety margin (maybe twice X or something).
If CPU is low enough, use the spare power to analyse as many tracks as possible. If playing something, scan fewer tracks.
In other words - if nothing else is happening, scan the max possible with all cores. If something else is going on, give the scan less priority.
More playing, less scanning. Less playing, more scanning. :-)
Posté Thu 17 Jul 14 @ 6:03 am
Fruit
But if a song is scanned at 100% cpu (what it actually does I believe)
It would take the same time as scanning 2 songs together at 50% cpu...
Or am I missing something ?
It would take the same time as scanning 2 songs together at 50% cpu...
Or am I missing something ?
Posté Thu 17 Jul 14 @ 5:57 pm
Fruit
Sorry I wanted to say :
Scanning 2 songs separately @ 100% would take the same time as scanning 2 songs together @ 50%.
Scanning 2 songs separately @ 100% would take the same time as scanning 2 songs together @ 50%.
Posté Sat 19 Jul 14 @ 3:31 am
groovindj
Fruit wrote :
100% cpu (what it actually does I believe)
No......I just checked and it's showing around 30-40%.
Posté Sat 19 Jul 14 @ 7:28 am
Fruit
My computer must be very old :(
Posté Sat 19 Jul 14 @ 9:27 am
Sonido Alto Voltaje
My CPU usage is between 15-25% while analyzing. Id like to know if it's multithreading. Memory usage is very low.
Posté Sat 19 Jul 14 @ 1:11 pm