sbangs
shocking news folks
on the dj mag website
i was reading the review
http://www.djmag.com/tech/Hercules_DJ_Console_Mk2.pdf
of the mk2
in which virtual dj is refered to as tacky , cheap "Overall the software feels a bit cheap"
and unprofesional looking "Virtual DJ software included certainly
doesn't look as trimmed and professional"
and had way to many graphics on screen which where confusing for pro djs and producers
and not as good as tracktor
i personaly have been using virtual dj and automix mp3 since they came out
and im personaly a total fan of this software
what they failed to mention is that virtual dj gives you twice the features at roughly half the price
supports a whole range of hardware ,
it is not tacky it is very stable and reliable
the interface is not unprofesional far from it alows many features to be shown which in other programs are ferreted away in hard to find menus
the screen shows alot of useful information
im not impressed with dj mag!
on the dj mag website
i was reading the review
http://www.djmag.com/tech/Hercules_DJ_Console_Mk2.pdf
of the mk2
in which virtual dj is refered to as tacky , cheap "Overall the software feels a bit cheap"
and unprofesional looking "Virtual DJ software included certainly
doesn't look as trimmed and professional"
and had way to many graphics on screen which where confusing for pro djs and producers
and not as good as tracktor
i personaly have been using virtual dj and automix mp3 since they came out
and im personaly a total fan of this software
what they failed to mention is that virtual dj gives you twice the features at roughly half the price
supports a whole range of hardware ,
it is not tacky it is very stable and reliable
the interface is not unprofesional far from it alows many features to be shown which in other programs are ferreted away in hard to find menus
the screen shows alot of useful information
im not impressed with dj mag!
Posté Thu 14 Sep 06 @ 8:52 pm
Dj Xeo
if they could have used it with the 4.0 version im sure they would have been suitably impressed. also predjudice to programs with poor styling is to be expected, recall the statement of 'the program ran without a hitch but it looked a bit cheep'
just goes to show that they are less interested in stability than the look of the program, what do you expect for the money paid? i would chalenge them to buy better software and a controler for the same price
just goes to show that they are less interested in stability than the look of the program, what do you expect for the money paid? i would chalenge them to buy better software and a controler for the same price
Posté Thu 14 Sep 06 @ 9:17 pm
Bren F
DJ Mag is a British magazine and not the most trustworthy at that. They have a great Bias towards PCDJ products, which is also a British company. Anyone who seriously can claim PCDJ has a fraction above Virtual DJ needs their head examining. Clearly Virtual DJ is superior, and that is evident in its recent success.
Posté Thu 14 Sep 06 @ 9:28 pm
abnorm
They mention that many functions can only be accessed by the computer keyboard, which is totally untrue.
Regarding the 3.4 version default skin, I have to agree with them... Version 4 skin looks much much better, but it's only a skin. This software is much more powerful then anything else out there, and people are slowly starting to realize this.
Regarding the 3.4 version default skin, I have to agree with them... Version 4 skin looks much much better, but it's only a skin. This software is much more powerful then anything else out there, and people are slowly starting to realize this.
Posté Thu 14 Sep 06 @ 9:29 pm
Rune (DJ-In-Norway)
wow... I totally respected DJmag until now. I been aware of their connection to the UK softmare PCDJ for some time, but now Dj Mag made a all time low.... Anyone trying the demo if VDJ will easily see that VDJ is lighyears ahead of PCDJ... except DJ mag... what a shame... Oh well :) who cares really
Posté Fri 15 Sep 06 @ 1:45 am
sbangs
true lol , but i had to vent my anger some where :D
Posté Fri 15 Sep 06 @ 10:49 am
asymptote
The reviewer hasn't been able to put the content in the context of the price. £178 (or less) for f***s sake for a controller and software. Must be the bargain of the year!
We all know the previous criticisms of VDJ's skin, especially from SSL users, it's sad that a reviewer can't give a bit more informed point. But, it's not all bad. I can see a lot of people buying the controller following the review. Then they will join us on the forums and as time goes on become VDJ fans like us..
A
We all know the previous criticisms of VDJ's skin, especially from SSL users, it's sad that a reviewer can't give a bit more informed point. But, it's not all bad. I can see a lot of people buying the controller following the review. Then they will join us on the forums and as time goes on become VDJ fans like us..
A
Posté Fri 15 Sep 06 @ 12:10 pm
digimixer
I wouldnt get too upset about it people, at the end of the day it is only one persons view.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
In a way i can understand why some people take a while to get to grips with VDJ, due to its unrivaled versatility and it's eagerness to be able to meet the many varied demands will all have of it, it can take a while to get it setup exactly how you want it.
Personally i'd take the extra investment of time needed to reap the huge possibiltites that VDJ offers everytime over it's more limited and thus easier to get to grips with competitors.
But it is all about personal preference.
Just a shame that his opinion appeared a a DJ Mag website and so some people will consider it as fact.
Personally though when ever i'm reveiwing software or hardware with a view to purchase, i research many different sources of information to get an overall feel the for general perception, so this 'one' review wouldnt have put me off.
Im sure most other people do the same.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
In a way i can understand why some people take a while to get to grips with VDJ, due to its unrivaled versatility and it's eagerness to be able to meet the many varied demands will all have of it, it can take a while to get it setup exactly how you want it.
Personally i'd take the extra investment of time needed to reap the huge possibiltites that VDJ offers everytime over it's more limited and thus easier to get to grips with competitors.
But it is all about personal preference.
Just a shame that his opinion appeared a a DJ Mag website and so some people will consider it as fact.
Personally though when ever i'm reveiwing software or hardware with a view to purchase, i research many different sources of information to get an overall feel the for general perception, so this 'one' review wouldnt have put me off.
Im sure most other people do the same.
Posté Fri 15 Sep 06 @ 12:24 pm
sbangs
a very wise comment:)
unfortunately i work with alot of begginers offering them advise they tend to jump on the first review they find , and as you very correctly said some people will assume this is fact
its just anoying because i have heard they have some deal with other softwares to promote them some where if i find the link again il post it
so its not fair :(
Peace
a concerned vjd lover lol
unfortunately i work with alot of begginers offering them advise they tend to jump on the first review they find , and as you very correctly said some people will assume this is fact
its just anoying because i have heard they have some deal with other softwares to promote them some where if i find the link again il post it
so its not fair :(
Peace
a concerned vjd lover lol
digimixer wrote :
I wouldnt get too upset about it people, at the end of the day it is only one persons view.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
In a way i can understand why some people take a while to get to grips with VDJ, due to its unrivaled versatility and it's eagerness to be able to meet the many varied demands will all have of it, it can take a while to get it setup exactly how you want it.
Personally i'd take the extra investment of time needed to reap the huge possibiltites that VDJ offers everytime over it's more limited and thus easier to get to grips with competitors.
But it is all about personal preference.
Just a shame that his opinion appeared a a DJ Mag website and so some people will consider it as fact.
Personally though when ever i'm reveiwing software or hardware with a view to purchase, i research many different sources of information to get an overall feel the for general perception, so this 'one' review wouldnt have put me off.
Im sure most other people do the same.
Everyone is entitled to their own opinion.
In a way i can understand why some people take a while to get to grips with VDJ, due to its unrivaled versatility and it's eagerness to be able to meet the many varied demands will all have of it, it can take a while to get it setup exactly how you want it.
Personally i'd take the extra investment of time needed to reap the huge possibiltites that VDJ offers everytime over it's more limited and thus easier to get to grips with competitors.
But it is all about personal preference.
Just a shame that his opinion appeared a a DJ Mag website and so some people will consider it as fact.
Personally though when ever i'm reveiwing software or hardware with a view to purchase, i research many different sources of information to get an overall feel the for general perception, so this 'one' review wouldnt have put me off.
Im sure most other people do the same.
Posté Fri 15 Sep 06 @ 3:46 pm
discobobsie
I dont see a problem with the article all that is said is he did not like the defalt skin. i think the skin in 3.4 looked a bit cheap and like a kids program so i down loaded the skin that look like serato as it fitted my needs for tcv work and i dont need the vid stuff but thats my view and every one has there own views be it vdj or pcdj or mac or pc.,
I also think it would be great if vdj came in two packages one for just tcv/tccd and no video and one with....
I also think it would be great if vdj came in two packages one for just tcv/tccd and no video and one with....
Posté Fri 15 Sep 06 @ 3:52 pm