Please consider adding bigger loops, yeah 1, 2 4 and 8 are good, but wht about 16 and 32, serious loops!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks 4 your time
Thanks 4 your time
Posté Wed 08 May 02 @ 12:04 am
stuxxx
Hi there
This has been mentioned in the forum a number of times, I think you'll find the problem with longer loops is the available memory within the software and both the 16 and 32 would create problems !!
If i am wrong , i'm sure someone will correct me !!!
Happy mixing
STU
This has been mentioned in the forum a number of times, I think you'll find the problem with longer loops is the available memory within the software and both the 16 and 32 would create problems !!
If i am wrong , i'm sure someone will correct me !!!
Happy mixing
STU
Posté Wed 08 May 02 @ 1:47 am
NaDeR
check this out http://www.atomixmp3.com/forum/display.html?forum=4&topic=1818
NaDeR
NaDeR
Posté Wed 08 May 02 @ 2:18 am
No way. I can get almost a minute of stereo sound into a 10MB wave file.
Any relatively modern computer has a _minimum_ of 256MB. Even a relatively slow song, at 60BPM, could get 32 beats into a size that would be easily manageable by a decent computer.
Besides, I have over a gigabyte of memory. I don't want someone ELSE'S memory limitations to become a limitation on what I can do. Let the user decide/discover how much they can sample.
No, it's technologically very possible.
Any relatively modern computer has a _minimum_ of 256MB. Even a relatively slow song, at 60BPM, could get 32 beats into a size that would be easily manageable by a decent computer.
Besides, I have over a gigabyte of memory. I don't want someone ELSE'S memory limitations to become a limitation on what I can do. Let the user decide/discover how much they can sample.
No, it's technologically very possible.
Posté Fri 14 Jun 02 @ 8:36 am